Back to election results

FULL RESULTS — EVERY RACE

46 measures · 45 wins · 0 losses · 257,771 votes counted

RACE-BY-RACE

California

CommunityCountyResultAnti- data centerPro- data centerTotalStatus

City of Alhambra

Voter-locked ban on data centers in all zones

Los AngelesWIN13,314 (82.2%)2,889 (17.8%)16,203Partial results

Florida

CommunityCountyResultAnti- data centerPro- data centerTotalStatus

City of Edgewater

Prohibition on New Data Centers (charter amendment)

VolusiaWIN7,875 (77.2%)2,328 (22.8%)10,203Complete results

Illinois

CommunityCountyResultAnti- data centerPro- data centerTotalStatus

Chouteau Township

Advisory: permit new data centers in the township?

MadisonWIN1,817 (83.3%)365 (16.7%)2,182Complete results

City of Bloomington Township

Advisory: moratorium on large-scale data centers

McLeanWIN21,851 (77.6%)6,316 (22.4%)28,167Complete results

Granite City Township

Advisory: permit new data centers in the township?

MadisonWIN5,703 (74.4%)1,959 (25.6%)7,662Complete results

Joliet Township

Advisory: should the Joliet City Council approve AI data centers?

WillWIN14,207 (78.9%)3,800 (21.1%)18,007Complete results

Morgan County

Advisory: restrictions on data centers countywide

MorganWIN9,413 (88.3%)1,250 (11.7%)10,663Complete results

Nameoki Township

Advisory: permit new data centers in the township?

MadisonWIN2,117 (77.9%)602 (22.1%)2,719Complete results

Venice Township

Advisory: permit new data centers in the township?

MadisonWIN978 (75.9%)311 (24.1%)1,289Complete results

Kansas

CommunityCountyResultAnti- data centerPro- data centerTotalStatus

City of Americus

Ban on high-impact data centers and large battery storage

LyonWIN274 (68.3%)127 (31.7%)401Complete results

City of El Dorado

Ten-year ban on high-impact data centers and large battery storage

ButlerWIN2,972 (71.5%)1,183 (28.5%)4,155Complete results

City of Emporia

Ban on high-impact data centers in all zoning districts

LyonWIN4,346 (60.1%)2,891 (39.9%)7,237Complete results

City of Ottawa

Ban on data centers over 25 MW

FranklinWIN2,882 (71.9%)1,129 (28.1%)4,011Partial results

Maine

CommunityCountyResultAnti- data centerPro- data centerTotalStatus

Town of Eliot

180-day moratorium on data centers of any size

YorkWIN2,965 (76.5%)909 (23.5%)3,874Complete results

Town of Freedom

Temporary moratorium on data centers of any size

WaldoWIN331 (74.2%)115 (25.8%)446Complete results

Town of North Berwick

Zoning amendment banning data centers of 25,000 sq ft or more

YorkWIN2,114 (78.4%)582 (21.6%)2,696Complete results

Town of Peru

180-day moratorium on data center development and permitting

OxfordWIN578 (76.1%)182 (23.9%)760Complete results

Town of Sabattus

180-day moratorium on data centers of 10,000 sq ft or 20 MW

AndroscogginWIN1,565 (66.4%)791 (33.6%)2,356Complete results

Town of Wells

Retroactive 180-day moratorium on data centers of 100,000 sq ft or more

YorkWIN5,818 (81.9%)1,282 (18.1%)7,100Complete results

Town of Wiscasset

Six-month moratorium on new or expanded data centers

LincolnWIN1,363 (65.7%)712 (34.3%)2,075Complete results

Town of Brownfield

180-day moratorium on data centers of 5,000 sq ft or more

OxfordPENDING———Awaiting results

Nevada

CommunityCountyResultAnti- data centerPro- data centerTotalStatus

Boulder City

Allow data centers in the Eldorado Valley Transfer Area

ClarkWIN4,726 (70.5%)1,973 (29.5%)6,699Partial results

New Jersey

CommunityCountyResultAnti- data centerPro- data centerTotalStatus

Town of Belvidere

Advisory: should the town pursue a data center ban in its Master Plan review?

WarrenWIN711 (74.8%)240 (25.2%)951Complete results

Downe Township

Advisory: do you support data centers in the township?

CumberlandWIN425 (87.3%)62 (12.7%)487Partial results

Ohio

CommunityCountyResultAnti- data centerPro- data centerTotalStatus

City of Conneaut

Charter amendment banning data centers over 25 MW

AshtabulaWIN2,301 (65.4%)1,218 (34.6%)3,519Complete results

City of Defiance

Charter amendment banning data centers over 25 MW

DefianceWIN3,823 (64.7%)2,083 (35.3%)5,906Complete results

City of Hubbard

Ban on data centers (initiated ordinance)

TrumbullWIN2,622 (76.6%)802 (23.4%)3,424Complete results

City of Pataskala

Charter amendment banning data centers over 25 MW

LickingWIN5,418 (73.6%)1,941 (26.4%)7,359Complete results

City of Piqua

Charter amendment banning data centers over 25 MW

MiamiWIN4,061 (66.7%)2,027 (33.3%)6,088Complete results

City of Sunbury

Charter amendment banning data centers over 25 MW

DelawareWIN2,809 (78.6%)763 (21.4%)3,572Complete results

City of Trenton

Charter amendment banning data centers over 25 MW

ButlerWIN3,541 (79.7%)903 (20.3%)4,444Complete results

City of Upper Sandusky

Charter amendment banning data centers over 25 MW

WyandotWIN1,893 (76.9%)568 (23.1%)2,461Complete results

City of Urbana

Charter amendment banning data centers (an organization's own facility under 7.5 MW is exempt)

ChampaignWIN2,978 (77.3%)877 (22.7%)3,855Complete results

City of Wilmington (parcel 1 of 4)

Rezoning referendum: SR 730 (119.373 acres), Ordinance O-26-04

ClintonWIN2,885 (79.6%)739 (20.4%)3,624Complete results

City of Wilmington (parcel 2 of 4)

Rezoning referendum: McGuinn Road (191.12 acres), Ordinance O-26-06

ClintonWIN2,887 (80.0%)724 (20.0%)3,611Complete results

City of Wilmington (parcel 3 of 4)

Rezoning referendum: U.S. 68 South (170.11 acres), Ordinance O-26-07

ClintonWIN2,909 (80.2%)716 (19.8%)3,625Complete results

City of Wilmington (parcel 4 of 4)

Rezoning referendum: 1957 SR 730 (65.29 acres), Ordinance O-26-05

ClintonWIN2,886 (79.8%)732 (20.2%)3,618Complete results

Monroe Township

Adopt township zoning to regulate a data center at the Killen plant site

AdamsWIN148 (59.7%)100 (40.3%)248Complete results

Sprigg Township

Adopt township zoning to regulate a data center at the Stuart plant site

AdamsWIN330 (52.6%)297 (47.4%)627Complete results

Village of Ashville

Referendum on Resolution 06-2026 (EdgeConneX development agreement)

PickawayWIN1,469 (81.6%)331 (18.4%)1,800Complete results

Village of Granville

Charter amendment prohibiting data centers (Section 10.12)

LickingWIN2,015 (82.4%)429 (17.6%)2,444Complete results

Village of Monroeville

Advisory question on allowing data center development

HuronWIN394 (87.8%)55 (12.2%)449Complete results

Village of Perry

Bond and noise guarantee for hyperscale data centers seeking tax breaks

LakeWIN946 (87.1%)140 (12.9%)1,086Complete results

City of Grove City

Community Consent Amendment (voter approval for large developments)

FranklinWIN11,317 (54.6%)9,411 (45.4%)20,728Partial results

City of Oregon

Charter amendment capping data centers at 25 MW

LucasWIN4,994 (60.7%)3,235 (39.3%)8,229Partial results

Wisconsin

CommunityCountyResultAnti- data centerPro- data centerTotalStatus

City of Janesville

Voter approval required for projects over $450M at the GM/JATCO site

RockWIN16,779 (62.8%)9,932 (37.2%)26,711Complete results

COUNTY-BY-COUNTY

StateCountyMeasuresW–LAnti- data centerPro- data centerTotal
CaliforniaLos Angeles11–013,3142,88916,203
FloridaVolusia11–07,8752,32810,203
IllinoisMadison44–010,6153,23713,852
IllinoisMcLean11–021,8516,31628,167
IllinoisMorgan11–09,4131,25010,663
IllinoisWill11–014,2073,80018,007
KansasButler11–02,9721,1834,155
KansasFranklin11–02,8821,1294,011
KansasLyon22–04,6203,0187,638
MaineAndroscoggin11–01,5657912,356
MaineLincoln11–01,3637122,075
MaineOxford21–0578182760
MaineWaldo11–0331115446
MaineYork33–010,8972,77313,670
NevadaClark11–04,7261,9736,699
New JerseyCumberland11–042562487
New JerseyWarren11–0711240951
OhioAdams22–0478397875
OhioAshtabula11–02,3011,2183,519
OhioButler11–03,5419034,444
OhioChampaign11–02,9788773,855
OhioClinton44–011,5672,91114,478
OhioDefiance11–03,8232,0835,906
OhioDelaware11–02,8097633,572
OhioFranklin11–011,3179,41120,728
OhioHuron11–039455449
OhioLake11–09461401,086
OhioLicking22–07,4332,3709,803
OhioLucas11–04,9943,2358,229
OhioMiami11–04,0612,0276,088
OhioPickaway11–01,4693311,800
OhioTrumbull11–02,6228023,424
OhioWyandot11–01,8935682,461
WisconsinRock11–016,7799,93226,711